xiangfu0 commented on PR #11857: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/11857#issuecomment-1791831620
> i am a bit confused by the pairs, IIUC > > * `LUCENE_V9_TEXT_INDEX_FILE_EXTENSION` is the newer version of `LUCENE_TEXT_INDEX_FILE_EXTENSION` > * `FST_V9_INDEX_FILE_EXTENSION` is the newer version of `FST_INDEX_FILE_EXTENSION` > > is that correct? if so i wasn't sure where the original LUCENE 8 usage were put yes, the reader is transparent, lucene reader is smart enough to pick the right codec. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
