vvivekiyer commented on code in PR #10373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10373#discussion_r1124906255
##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/accounting/PerQueryCPUMemAccountantFactory.java:
##########
@@ -724,14 +745,14 @@ void killAllQueries() {
*/
private void killMostExpensiveQuery() {
if (!_aggregatedUsagePerActiveQuery.isEmpty() &&
_numQueriesKilledConsecutively >= _gcTriggerCount) {
- System.gc();
_numQueriesKilledConsecutively = 0;
+ System.gc();
try {
- Thread.sleep(_normalSleepTime);
+ Thread.sleep(_gcWaitTime);
} catch (InterruptedException ignored) {
}
_usedBytes = MEMORY_MX_BEAN.getHeapMemoryUsage().getUsed();
- if (_usedBytes < _criticalLevel) {
+ if (_usedBytes < _criticalLevelAfterGC) {
Review Comment:
Would this end up killing more queries than usual?
Let's say
criticalThreshold=95%
usedMemory=96%
CriticalLevelAFterGC=80%
After performing GC in L749, if the usedMemory=85%, we would end up killing
the most expensive query even though the criticalThreshold is 95%. Is that
expected?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
