nizarhejazi commented on code in PR #9086:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9086#discussion_r936136822
##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/aggregation/function/CountAggregationFunction.java:
##########
@@ -89,7 +122,33 @@ public void aggregate(int length, AggregationResultHolder
aggregationResultHolde
@Override
public void aggregateGroupBySV(int length, int[] groupKeyArray,
GroupByResultHolder groupByResultHolder,
Map<ExpressionContext, BlockValSet> blockValSetMap) {
- if (blockValSetMap.isEmpty()) {
+ if (blockValSetMap.isEmpty() ||
!blockValSetMap.containsKey(STAR_TREE_COUNT_STAR_EXPRESSION)) {
Review Comment:
The overhead is should be minimal. I don't have strong opinion either way.
Will apply your commit.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
