mqliang commented on a change in pull request #7368:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/7368#discussion_r718894821



##########
File path: 
pinot-plugins/pinot-minion-tasks/pinot-minion-builtin-tasks/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/plugin/minion/tasks/mergerollup/MergeRollupTaskGenerator.java
##########
@@ -463,4 +490,71 @@ private long getWatermarkMs(long minStartTimeMs, long 
bucketMs, String mergeLeve
 
     return pinotTaskConfigs;
   }
+
+  private long getMergeRollupTaskDelayInNumTimeBuckets(long watermarkMs, long 
bufferTimeMs, long bucketTimeMs) {
+    if (bufferTimeMs == 0 || watermarkMs == -1) {
+      return 0;
+    }
+    return (long) Math.floor((System.currentTimeMillis() - watermarkMs - 
bufferTimeMs) / (double) bucketTimeMs);
+  }
+
+  private void setWatermarkMs(String tableNameWithType, String mergeLevel, 
long watermarkMs, long bufferTimeMs,
+      long bucketTimeMs) {
+    LOGGER.info(
+        "Setting watermark for table: {} and mergeLevel: {} is {} 
(watermarkMs={}, bufferTimeMs={}, bucketTimeMs={})",
+        tableNameWithType, mergeLevel, 
getMergeRollupTaskDelayInNumTimeBuckets(watermarkMs, bufferTimeMs, 
bucketTimeMs),
+        watermarkMs, bucketTimeMs, bucketTimeMs);
+
+    ControllerMetrics controllerMetrics = 
_clusterInfoAccessor.getControllerMetrics();
+    if (controllerMetrics == null) {
+      return;
+    }
+
+    PinotMetricsRegistry metricsRegistry = 
controllerMetrics.getMetricsRegistry();
+    if (metricsRegistry == null) {
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // Update gauge value that indicates the delay in terms of the number of 
time buckets.
+    _mergeRollupWatermarks.computeIfAbsent(tableNameWithType, k -> new 
HashMap<>());
+    Map<String, Long> watermarkForTable = 
_mergeRollupWatermarks.get(tableNameWithType);
+
+    watermarkForTable.compute(mergeLevel, (k, v) -> {
+      if (v == null) {
+        
controllerMetrics.addCallbackGaugeIfNeeded(getMetricNameForTaskDelay(tableNameWithType,
 mergeLevel),
+            (() -> 
getMergeRollupTaskDelayInNumTimeBuckets(watermarkForTable.getOrDefault(k, -1L), 
bufferTimeMs,
+                bucketTimeMs)));
+      }

Review comment:
       Do we need add a `else` block here which remove the old CallbackGauge 
and add a new CallbackGauge when `v != null`?

##########
File path: 
pinot-plugins/pinot-minion-tasks/pinot-minion-builtin-tasks/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/plugin/minion/tasks/mergerollup/MergeRollupTaskGenerator.java
##########
@@ -463,4 +490,71 @@ private long getWatermarkMs(long minStartTimeMs, long 
bucketMs, String mergeLeve
 
     return pinotTaskConfigs;
   }
+
+  private long getMergeRollupTaskDelayInNumTimeBuckets(long watermarkMs, long 
bufferTimeMs, long bucketTimeMs) {
+    if (bufferTimeMs == 0 || watermarkMs == -1) {
+      return 0;
+    }
+    return (long) Math.floor((System.currentTimeMillis() - watermarkMs - 
bufferTimeMs) / (double) bucketTimeMs);

Review comment:
       Is it possible that `bucketTimeMs ` be 0? which will cause "divide by 
zero" exception.

##########
File path: 
pinot-plugins/pinot-minion-tasks/pinot-minion-builtin-tasks/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/plugin/minion/tasks/mergerollup/MergeRollupTaskGenerator.java
##########
@@ -339,6 +351,21 @@ public String getTaskType() {
           .info("Finished generating task configs for table: {} for task: {}, 
numTasks: {}", offlineTableName, taskType,
               pinotTaskConfigsForTable.size());
     }
+
+    // Reset watermarks for invalid tables. This covers the metrics clean up 
when the table is removed or the merge
+    // config is added and then removed.
+    LeadControllerManager leadControllerManager = 
_clusterInfoAccessor.getLeaderControllerManager();

Review comment:
       L385-L268 can be changed as
   ```
   for (String tableNameWithType : _mergeRollupWatermarks.keySet()) {
       if (!leadControllerManager.isLeaderForTable(tableNameWithType)) {
           resetWatermarkMs(tableNameWithType);
       }
   }
   ```
   Since _mergeRollupWatermarks is a HashMap, so looping over 
_mergeRollupWatermarks.keySet() will not iterating duplicate keys, so the 
`!candidateMergeTables.contains(tableNameWithType)` check is not needed.
   




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to