npawar commented on issue #7262: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/7262#issuecomment-898635978
> @npawar Thank you very much, this configuration works for me as well! > However, I'm still wondering why this is all necessary as your examples, e.g. gitHubEvents also contain nested fields "foo.bar" and there no special transformation configuration is needed. The only difference I see is, I'm using AVRO where the gitHubEvents example uses JSON. > > Maybe you wanna have a look at this as well, but I guess this ticket can be closed. Thanks to all for supporting me here, I'll continue my test with Pinot. We are able to use it directly in that example, because the `complexTypeConfig` has been set. Before `complexTypeConfig` feature was developed, we would use the transform configs like in my example above. Those transform configs have been well tested now, and used by many people, hence I felt it was the best way for you to move forward. The `complexTypeConfig` is a very new feature, so there might be some minor issues in documentation/support that we need to iron out. Will let @yupeng9 comment on whether your use-case could have been achieved using the complex config, and what's the right config to set for that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
