mrhhsg commented on PR #69288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/69288#issuecomment-6281616734

   <!-- autopilot-response -->
   Reviewed the current review state at head 
`be394b4675c2df72f939406ee66e724d52b195c2`.
   
   - `PRR_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABTBibMA` (Code Review, COMMENTED): the review reports 
no actionable findings. It confirms that the current object is already open and 
waiting for a key, that removing the extra start/close pair leaves one matching 
close so enclosing objects can emit their remaining members, and that the added 
BE rows and regression cases cover the reported failure plus 
empty/non-empty/deeper objects, sibling ordering, mixed sibling types, empty 
keys and the array-parent control. No unresolved candidate remains.
   - `IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdY8YwQ` (contribution checklist prompt): the PR 
description covers all five requested points, as noted in the previous round.
   - `IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdY8eBA` (`/review`): the review has now completed for 
this head with no findings, so there is nothing to fix from this comment.
   - `IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdZFJQA` (`run buildall`) and the following TPC-H / 
TPC-DS / ClickBench reports (`IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdbU2xA`, 
`IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdbhfWQ`, `IC_kwDOBfSlxs8AAAABdbnpOw`): benchmark runs for 
this head, informational only; no code action required.
   
   There are no unresolved inline review threads. No code changes were made in 
this round and the branch head is unchanged. Could a human reviewer take 
another look and approve if the change looks good?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to