reele commented on code in PR #17372:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/17372#discussion_r2235476146


##########
dolphinscheduler-worker/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/server/worker/executor/PhysicalTaskEngineDelegator.java:
##########
@@ -76,9 +78,14 @@ public boolean reassignWorkflowInstanceHost(final 
TaskExecutorReassignMasterRequ
         final int taskInstanceId = 
taskExecutorReassignMasterRequest.getTaskInstanceId();
         final String workflowHost = 
taskExecutorReassignMasterRequest.getWorkflowHost();
         // todo: Is this reassign can make sure there is no concurrent problem?
-        physicalTaskExecutorRepository.get(taskInstanceId).ifPresent(
-                taskExecutor -> 
taskExecutor.getTaskExecutionContext().setWorkflowInstanceHost(workflowHost));
-        return 
physicalTaskExecutorEventReporter.reassignWorkflowInstanceHost(taskInstanceId, 
workflowHost);
+        final Optional<ITaskExecutor> taskExecutorOptional = 
physicalTaskExecutorRepository.get(taskInstanceId);
+        
physicalTaskExecutorEventReporter.reassignWorkflowInstanceHost(taskInstanceId, 
workflowHost);
+        if (taskExecutorOptional.isPresent()) {
+            final ITaskExecutor taskExecutor = taskExecutorOptional.get();
+            
taskExecutor.getTaskExecutionContext().setWorkflowInstanceHost(workflowHost);
+            return true;
+        }
+        return false;

Review Comment:
   get host address from TaskExecutor may not work, TaskExecutor's lifecycle 
and event's lifecycle are not completely overlapping, TaskExecutor will removed 
in onTaskExecutorFinalizeLifecycleEvent before the all events be reported.
   
   but the channel‘s lifecycle is similar to event, it still needs to lock.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to