squakez commented on PR #5119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/5119#issuecomment-2007558011

   > > > I agree that we need some docs but since this PR is part of a larger 
issue and the rationale was briefly explained in [#3397 
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3397#issuecomment-1735525398),
 then I wonder if the doc could be something we do as a separate PR.
   > > 
   > > 
   > > In theory we want to release 2.3 by the end of the month. If we ends up 
merging this we'd include in 2.3 which, IIUC would not be either complete as 
still missing pieces (beside documentation). My suggestion would be to wait the 
release of 2.3 then, and to merge right after so you can focus on the rest of 
development to be ready for 2.4. Or, if you want to push this in 2.3 complete 
with the required documentation.
   > 
   > I think this is more for 3.x than 2.x, wonder if we should branch 2.x now 
and move main toward 3.x
   
   No problem for me. Mind that there may be some work to perform on the 
actions as well (nightly upgrades, releases, etc...) and likely this has to be 
communicated and accepted by the community before.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to