aldettinger edited a comment on pull request #2635: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/2635#issuecomment-845040248
Indeed, splitting more between jackson and jacksonxml would make the code more readable. Concerning jackson features, I was first in the idea that it is the responsibility of quarkus-jackson to test them. But given, we already found an issue with @ JsonView, I wonder if it would make sense to test @ JsonInclude also ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
