On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:59:16AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > > "Implementations of this specification MUST respect the 'output gain' > field, but MAY NOT respect the comments. Encoder authors are advised to > take this into account. For example, it is more robust for a > post-processing application to performing track normalization to update > the 'output gain' field and write a comment 'R128_TRACK_GAIN=0' than to > put the normalization value directly in the comment."
s/to performing/performing/ ? Or maybe "that is performing"? But yeah, modulo whatever still seems to be misleading Ian, that seems about right to me. Ron _______________________________________________ codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
