On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: >> For example, to produce R128 >> normalized files it's more reliable for post-processing application to >> update the 'output gain' field and write a comment 'R128_TRACK_GAIN=0' >> than to put the normalized value directly in the comment." > > Should the example there be ALBUM_GAIN rather than track gain > (consistent with what we recommended before these changes, and > with what is probably preferred in the absence of finer grained > recalibration)?
Is there a reason we shouldn't just have two examples? _______________________________________________ codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
