The more I think about it, the less certain I am which was which now. It was a long time ago, but I know that I had to use a hole saw for at least one of them in replacing Datamarine with Raytheon.
Steve. ----- Original Message ----- From: S Thomas via CnC-List To: [email protected] Cc: S Thomas Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:12 Subject: Re: Stus-List Removal of Datamarine depth transponder Patrick, Come to think of it, you are correct. I had to cut a bigger hole for the Airmar speed transducer, and not the depth transducer, as I previously and erroneously stated. My bad. Steve Thomas C&C27 MKIII C&C36 MKI ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Davin via CnC-List To: [email protected] Cc: Patrick Davin Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:19 Subject: Re: Stus-List Removal of Datamarine depth transponder <snip> @ Steve Thomas: The Datamarine speed transducer in my experience was exactly the same diameter as the Airmar transducers. Are you saying the depth trans is smaller than the speed? That would be surprising, but I suppose it's possible. -Patrick C&C LF38 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Email address: [email protected] To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Email address: [email protected] To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________ Email address: [email protected] To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
