> IMO clearly this clearly does not work for all kinds of writing > processes. But for some it works perfectly. The problem is the > generalization that this statement implies that does not have a basis > rather then speculation (or fashion). > > Best regards, > > Nuno Lopes > Independent Consultant
I'm curious, can you give an example of where it doesn't work? Maybe I've missed something :) It's interesting that it seems to be such a great controversy around this, I would think that many authors would relish the fact that instead of spawning out a multitude of html tags they can use a few simple and meaningful ones. But then again maybe the claim is that most cms's uses a WYSIWYG editor and they don't have to write tags at all, but still. Personally I think that vendords invested so much time and money into their WYSIGWYG tools that they're loathe to give them up ;) It's a easier sell to say "just press this button" for bold than trying to explain the XML-paradigm best regard --- Mattias Konradsson -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
