On Nov 28, 2007 12:56 AM, George Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe I am missing the obvious, but I am trying to understand -why- this > list is talking about replacing the current CMake language.
- better scoping - higher quality, outsourced documentation - outsource core language bugs - popularity boost for 5 years - some advanced programming constructs gained Anyone want to add to this? Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
