On Nov 27, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 3:50 PM, Juan Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The goal of course is to have a language which is well documented,
Yep.
popular,
Or at least not unpopular. There's a perception that TCL has "lost"
the scripting wars.
self-consistent,
Yep.
and not home-made.
Well, there are quality and maintenance tradeoffs here. Someone
else's language ain't that great if it's a PITA to use.
if Lua takes off, it will be much better than what we have now.
I'm not convinced. I'd like to see an acutal Lua build system, to get
an idea just how many quotes and unpack() statements I'd likely be
typing. Googling...
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
How about we give the cmake developers some time to address some of
the shortcomings of CMake BEFORE we toss the baby out with the bath
water...
--
Mike Jackson Senior Research Engineer
Innovative Management & Technology Services
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
