Quoting Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
David Cole wrote:
As you've noted, install rules to install it and its dependent
components from Qt are lacking. I do not know if there is anything
else "unfinished" in it. I'll let Clinton answer that question if
he's listening.
It will be done and included when CMake 2.6 becomes available.
(According to this thread,
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2007-November/017715.html
<http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2007-November/017715.html> ,
CMake 2.6 and the new book should both be available in January...)
I have un-checked in install rules. Please wait until next week
when I am back to add the install rules. Also, because of the GPL,
only people with a commercial license to QT will be allowed to
contribute to the Qt dialog.
Looks like I was too slow with the email....
Anyway, the GPL stuff still stands.
Why don't you make the Qt dialog source GPL, then?
With those restrictions, some Linux distributions will either strip
the Qt dialog from the source or move whole cmake to an unofficial
repository. Allowing everyone to change the source code (and
distribute the result) is greatly preferred.
HS
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
