On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:46 PM, bc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Very nice! However, shouldn't the modification to *print-length* be >> inside a binding - e.g.: > > Oh, no, those are two independent settings. 'show' is not helped much > the the constrained *print-length* since it does its own looping and > only over concrete things like method lists -- no infinite seqs there. > > No, the *print-length* is set for the whole REPL context to save > myself from pain when I accidentally evaluate the equivalent of > (iterate inc 0) at the prompt.
Ah, ok - I thought the *print-length* mod was related to the 'show' function. - Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
