On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:46 PM, bc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Very nice! However, shouldn't the modification to *print-length* be > inside a binding - e.g.:
Oh, no, those are two independent settings. 'show' is not helped much the the constrained *print-length* since it does its own looping and only over concrete things like method lists -- no infinite seqs there. No, the *print-length* is set for the whole REPL context to save myself from pain when I accidentally evaluate the equivalent of (iterate inc 0) at the prompt. --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
