balazske marked an inline comment as done.
balazske added inline comments.

================
Comment at: unittests/AST/StructuralEquivalenceTest.cpp:489
+
+TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceRecordTest, DISABLED_Methods) {
+  auto t = makeNamedDecls(
----------------
a_sidorin wrote:
> balazske wrote:
> > a_sidorin wrote:
> > > Could you add a comment why this test is disabled?
> > Methods are not checked, there was no decision about to include this check 
> > or not. The problem was related to performance overhead and if 
> > order-independent check of methods is needed. (ASTImporter should keep 
> > order of imported fields and methods.) (This test is about equivalence of 
> > `foo`.)
> You mean that imported decl have other order of methods? Do you mean implicit 
> methods (because I see only a single method here)? If so, could you please 
> note this in the comment?
The problem with the ordering is in general at structural equivalence check. If 
a complex structure is imported with ASTImporter the ordering of fields and 
methods may change in the imported class (relative to the to-be imported) after 
the import. Either order-independent check is needed in structural equivalence 
check to match two classes with same methods but in different order, or import 
should not change ordering. Currently none of these is implemented, methods are 
not checked at all. The `foo`s in this test should be non-equivalent because 
one different method `x`.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D48628



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to