jfb marked an inline comment as done.
jfb added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47290#1113365, @aaron.ballman wrote:

> This is relaxing `-Wformat` and making users instead write 
> `-Wformat-pedantic` to get the strong guarantees, which is the opposite of 
> what I thought the consensus was. Have I misunderstood something?


From Shoaib's email:

> Based on all the discussion so far, I think the consensus is that we don't 
> want to relax -Wformat by default, but an additional relaxed option would be 
> fine. That works for me (where I can just switch my codebases to use the new 
> warning option), but it wouldn't handle JF Bastien's use case, so he would 
> still want to pursue the relaxations specific to Apple platforms.

This patch is specific to the Darwin platform, as proposed in Alex' original 
patch and as I promised to do in the cfe-dev thread. Shoaib's follow-up would 
be different and do what I think you're referring to.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47290



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to