ahatanak added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45898#1104025, @rsmith wrote:
> As it happens, the C++ committee fixed the language wording hole here very > recently. The new rule can be found here: http://wg21.link/p0968r0#2227 > In summary: we should to consider the destructor for all elements of the > aggregate to be potentially-invoked. It doesn't mean that clang should reject the following code, does it? // This should compile fine as long as 'Deleted7d d7d' is commented out. struct DeletedDtor { ~DeletedDtor() = delete; }; struct Deleted7d { DeletedDtor a = {}; }; //Deleted7d d7d; I tried making a helper function out of the code in SK_UserConversion and using it in "case SK_ListInitialization". That doesn't seem to work because DiagnoseUseOfDecl rejects the code (with error message "error: attempt to use a deleted function") above even though the destructor isn't needed (because 'd7d' is commented out), so I guess that check should be done in another place. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45898 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
