rsmith added a comment. As it happens, the C++ committee fixed the language wording hole here very recently. The new rule can be found here: http://wg21.link/p0968r0#2227 In summary: we should to consider the destructor for all elements of the aggregate to be potentially-invoked.
@rjmccall Were you suggesting that we should also consider the destructor of the aggregate itself to be potentially-invoked, or just the elements? In the //new-expression// case at least, I don't think the former is permitted. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45898 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
