GorNishanov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45121#1056408, @lewissbaker wrote:
> The `coroutine_handle<noop_coroutine_promise>` type does not have a > `from_address()` or a `from_promise()` static functions in the same way that > the `coroutine_handle<P>` implementation does. > Is this intentional or an oversight in the TS wording? > > They don't seem hugely useful, so I'm not that worried. > If you know that you have a `coroutine_handle<noop_coroutine_promise>` then > you can just use `noop_coroutine()` to get the handle instead. This is intentional. The only way to get a noop coroutine is to ask for it via `noop_coroutine()` https://reviews.llvm.org/D45121 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
