hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clangd/index/SymbolCollector.cpp:75
+ // Skip nameless declarations.
+ if (ND->getDeclName().isEmpty())
+ return true;
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> What are those declarations exactly?
This would ignore anonymous declarations, e.g. anonymous class/enum. See the
unittest.
================
Comment at: unittests/clangd/SymbolCollectorTests.cpp:174
+ enum class Color2 {
+ Yellow
+ };
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> I'd say we should drop `enum` constants inside stongly-typed enums (i.e.
> `enum class`).
> They can't be found inside namespace by code completion, therefore being
> similar to static method in that regard. (And we don't include static methods
> now, right?)
yeah, that makes sense.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42074
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits