zaks.anna added a comment.

I'd also include some info on how it's now possible to dump the issue hash. You 
introduce a new debugging function here "clang_analyzer_hashDump" but it's not 
mentioned in the commit message.

Thanks!



================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp:68
   // (globals should not be invalidated, etc), hence the use of evalCall.
-  FnCheck Handler = llvm::StringSwitch<FnCheck>(C.getCalleeName(CE))
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_eval", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerEval)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_checkInlined",
-          &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCheckInlined)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_crash", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCrash)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_warnIfReached",
-          &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnIfReached)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_warnOnDeadSymbol",
-          &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnOnDeadSymbol)
-    .StartsWith("clang_analyzer_explain", 
&ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerExplain)
-    .StartsWith("clang_analyzer_dump", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerDump)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_getExtent", 
&ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerGetExtent)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_printState",
-          &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerPrintState)
-    .Case("clang_analyzer_numTimesReached",
-          &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerNumTimesReached)
-    .Default(nullptr);
+  FnCheck Handler =
+      llvm::StringSwitch<FnCheck>(C.getCalleeName(CE))
----------------
xazax.hun wrote:
> zaks.anna wrote:
> > Unrelated change?
> Since I touched this snippet I reformatted it using clang-format. Apart from 
> adding a new case before the default all other changes are formatting 
> changes. I will revert the formatting changes. So in general, we prefer to 
> minimize the diffs over converging to be clang-formatted?
It's much easier to review when the diff does not contain formatting changes 
intermixed with functional changes. Looks like you can configure clang-format 
to only format the diff.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D38844



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to