xazax.hun added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ExprInspectionChecker.cpp:68
// (globals should not be invalidated, etc), hence the use of evalCall.
- FnCheck Handler = llvm::StringSwitch<FnCheck>(C.getCalleeName(CE))
- .Case("clang_analyzer_eval", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerEval)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_checkInlined",
- &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCheckInlined)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_crash", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerCrash)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_warnIfReached",
- &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnIfReached)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_warnOnDeadSymbol",
- &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerWarnOnDeadSymbol)
- .StartsWith("clang_analyzer_explain",
&ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerExplain)
- .StartsWith("clang_analyzer_dump", &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerDump)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_getExtent",
&ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerGetExtent)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_printState",
- &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerPrintState)
- .Case("clang_analyzer_numTimesReached",
- &ExprInspectionChecker::analyzerNumTimesReached)
- .Default(nullptr);
+ FnCheck Handler =
+ llvm::StringSwitch<FnCheck>(C.getCalleeName(CE))
----------------
zaks.anna wrote:
> Unrelated change?
Since I touched this snippet I reformatted it using clang-format. Apart from
adding a new case before the default all other changes are formatting changes.
I will revert the formatting changes. So in general, we prefer to minimize the
diffs over converging to be clang-formatted?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38844
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
