pawosm-arm wrote: > > > > > Is there even a platform-generic type for scalable vectors yet? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sadly, no. > > > > > > > > > That seems like the thing we should solve first. After that I wouldn't be > > > surprised if we didn't need this builtin at all. > > > > > > No, it's the other way round. When I tried to introduce a platform-generic > > vector type, one of the comments was we should first improve builtin > > coverage of the sizeless vector types... > > This is basically adding `VectorOfT(T)` though
Does it cover the same applicability? > (assuming we end up designing a scalable vector type in a similar way to > `ext_vector_type`) We can't assume that. There was a lot of opposition and practical obstacles when I'd attempted to extend `ext_vector_type` to cover sizeless vector types. > We don't need another builtin for that. If others agree, I'm closing it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212758 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
