pawosm-arm wrote: > > > Is there even a platform-generic type for scalable vectors yet? > > > > > > Sadly, no. > > That seems like the thing we should solve first. After that I wouldn't be > surprised if we didn't need this builtin at all.
No, it's the other way round. When I tried to introduce a generic vector type, one of the comments was we should first improve builtin coverage of the sizeless vector types... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212758 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
