cor3ntin wrote: > > > WRT Eric's branch, I've worked with Eric to test changes he made and to > > > test it (see also the issues on his fork), and right now it ICEs on one > > > contract assertion in my (private) code base. GCC 16.1 also ICEs on one, > > > but a different one. As such, from a user point of view it's very close > > > to the same quality level as GCC, and redoing that work seems > > > counterproductive unless there's a different reason to do so. > > > > > > I didn't know it unluckily. If it is already tested well and Eric is not > > working on it, I'd like to take it. > > As @EricWF is not active right now, I'd like to take over his existing work. > > I saw it was a big patch on that branch. I prefer to split them into many > small snippets. This is helpful for me to understand the code better. And it > is better to other reviewers to understand too.
Sounds like a great direction! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
