ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > WRT Eric's branch, I've worked with Eric to test changes he made and to > > test it (see also the issues on his fork), and right now it ICEs on one > > contract assertion in my (private) code base. GCC 16.1 also ICEs on one, > > but a different one. As such, from a user point of view it's very close to > > the same quality level as GCC, and redoing that work seems > > counterproductive unless there's a different reason to do so. > > I didn't know it unluckily. If it is already tested well and Eric is not > working on it, I'd like to take it.
As @EricWF is not active right now, I'd like to take over his existing work. I saw it was a big patch on that branch. I prefer to split them into many small snippets. This is helpful for me to understand the code better. And it is better to other reviewers to understand too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
