lebedev.ri added a comment. Ping.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36836#877642, @lebedev.ri wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36836#877636, @alexfh wrote: > > > > The metric is implemented as per COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY by SonarSource > > > specification version 1.2 (19 April 2017), > > > > Err, "I did ask them, and received an answer that it is it can be > > implemented in clang-tidy" might not be enough. > > > F5372479: original_msg.txt <https://reviews.llvm.org/F5372479> > > Hello Roman, > > It would not, and I would be happy to be notified once done. > > Thanks > > Olivier > > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:17 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I would like to know, what is the legal status of > > https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf ? > > > > If i (or someone else) is to implement the Specification described in > > that paper, > > which will produce the same results as the Cognitive Complexity in > SonarSource > > as part of some other static analyzer, for example as a LLVM's clang-tidy > check, > > would that be illegal thing to do? > > > > Roman. > -- > Olivier Gaudin | SonarSource > CEO & Co-Founder > +41 (0)22 510 2424 > http://sonarsource.com > > > Might not be enough? @alexfh please specify, is that enough or not? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D36836 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
