JonasToth added a comment.
For my part the current state is ok. @alexfh and @aaron.ballman but should do
their review before committing.
I would be interested in a exampleoutput for any real project.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/FunctionCognitiveComplexityCheck.cpp:102-114
+const std::array<const char *const, 4> CognitiveComplexity::Msgs = {{
+ // B1 + B2 + B3
+ "+%0, including nesting penalty of %1, nesting level increased to %2",
+
+ // B1 + B2
+ "+%0, nesting level increased to %2",
+
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> JonasToth wrote:
> > lebedev.ri wrote:
> > > JonasToth wrote:
> > > > could this initialization land in line 45? that would be directly close
> > > > to the criteria.
> > > It would be nice indeed, but if i do
> > > ```
> > > // All the possible messages that can be outputed. The choice of the
> > > message
> > > // to use is based of the combination of the Criterias
> > > static constexpr std::array<const char *const, 4> Msgs = {{
> > > // B1 + B2 + B3
> > > "+%0, including nesting penalty of %1, nesting level increased to
> > > %2",
> > >
> > > // B1 + B2
> > > "+%0, nesting level increased to %2",
> > >
> > > // B1
> > > "+%0",
> > >
> > > // B2
> > > "nesting level increased to %2",
> > > }};
> > > ```
> > > i get
> > > ```
> > > $ ninja check-clang-tools -j1
> > > [1/5] Linking CXX executable bin/clang-tidy
> > > FAILED: bin/clang-tidy
> > > : && /usr/local/bin/clang++ -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
> > > -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -std=c++11 -Wall -W
> > > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
> > > -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> > > -Wcovered-switch-default -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor
> > > -Wstring-conversion -fcolor-diagnostics -ffunction-sections
> > > -fdata-sections -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-nested-anon-types
> > > -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wl,-allow-shlib-undefined -Wl,-O3 -Wl,--gc-sections
> > > tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/CMakeFiles/clang-tidy.dir/ClangTidyMain.cpp.o
> > > -o bin/clang-tidy -Wl,-rpath,"\$ORIGIN/../lib" lib/libLLVMSupport.a
> > > -lpthread lib/libclangAST.a lib/libclangASTMatchers.a lib/libclangBasic.a
> > > lib/libclangTidy.a lib/libclangTidyAndroidModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyBoostModule.a lib/libclangTidyBugproneModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyCERTModule.a lib/libclangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyGoogleModule.a lib/libclangTidyHICPPModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyLLVMModule.a lib/libclangTidyMiscModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyModernizeModule.a lib/libclangTidyMPIModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyPerformanceModule.a lib/libclangTidyReadabilityModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTooling.a lib/libclangToolingCore.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyCppCoreGuidelinesModule.a lib/libclangTidyGoogleModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyMiscModule.a lib/libclangTidyReadabilityModule.a
> > > lib/libclangTidyUtils.a lib/libclangTidy.a lib/libclangTooling.a
> > > lib/libclangFormat.a lib/libclangToolingCore.a
> > > lib/libclangStaticAnalyzerFrontend.a lib/libclangFrontend.a
> > > lib/libclangDriver.a lib/libLLVMOption.a lib/libclangParse.a
> > > lib/libLLVMMCParser.a lib/libclangSerialization.a lib/libclangSema.a
> > > lib/libclangEdit.a lib/libLLVMBitReader.a lib/libLLVMProfileData.a
> > > lib/libclangStaticAnalyzerCheckers.a lib/libclangStaticAnalyzerCore.a
> > > lib/libclangASTMatchers.a lib/libclangRewrite.a lib/libclangAnalysis.a
> > > lib/libclangAST.a lib/libclangLex.a lib/libclangBasic.a lib/libLLVMCore.a
> > > lib/libLLVMBinaryFormat.a lib/libLLVMMC.a lib/libLLVMSupport.a -lrt -ldl
> > > -ltinfo -lpthread -lz -lm lib/libLLVMDemangle.a && :
> > > lib/libclangTidyReadabilityModule.a(FunctionCognitiveComplexityCheck.cpp.o):FunctionCognitiveComplexityCheck.cpp:function
> > >
> > > clang::tidy::readability::FunctionCognitiveComplexityCheck::check(clang::ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult
> > > const&): error: undefined reference to
> > > 'clang::tidy::readability::(anonymous
> > > namespace)::CognitiveComplexity::Msgs'
> > > ```
> > > Same if `process()` returns `std::pair<unsigned, unsigned short>` and in
> > > `FunctionCognitiveComplexityCheck::check()` i do `const char
> > > *IncreaseMessage = Visitor.CC.Msgs[IncreaseMsgId];`
> > might the `static` cause that linking error?
> > Did you consider using `StringRef` instead of `const char*`? It is better
> > behaved.
> >
> > ```constexpr std::array<StringRef, 4> Msgs = { /* messages */ };```
> Actually, found a combination that works, done.
> FIXME: so should `const std::array<const StringRef, 4>
> CognitiveComplexity::Msgs` be `static` and initialized out-of-line, or not
> `static`, but initialized in-line?
Since it is already in an anonymous namespace, static would be duplicated,
wouldn't it? I like it now!
================
Comment at: docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:138
+
+ Checks function Cognitive Complexity metric, and flags the functions with
+ Cognitive Complexity exceeding the configured limit.
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> JonasToth wrote:
> > lebedev.ri wrote:
> > > JonasToth wrote:
> > > > How about
> > > > 'Applies the Cognitive Complexity metric to functions (classes?),
> > > > flagging those exceeding the configured limit/threshold'
> > > English is hard :P
> > > Reworded, maybe better?
> > I struggle with it as well ;D
> > `Calculates the Cognitive Complexity metric for each function and flags
> > those with a value exceeding the configured limit.`
> > I am not sure about the `flags those ...` part.
> > Swapping the beginning would make the sentence easier to read.
> Reworded once more
Sounds good. :)
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36836
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
