aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826#867155, @rjmccall wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826#866170, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826#866161, @JonasToth wrote: > > > > > There is an exception to the general rule (EXP36-C-EX2), stating that the > > > result of `malloc` and friends is allowed to be casted to stricter > > > alignments, since the pointer is known to be of correct alignment. > > > > > In practice, are there any malloc declarations still in use that return char* > instead of void*? I assume this does not complain when the source is void*. FWIW, I've not found any malloc declarations that return `char *` instead of `void *`, but if someone knows of one, I'd be curious to hear of it. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
