lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826#866133, @NorenaLeonetti wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826#861226, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Have you run this check over any large code bases to see what the quality > > of the diagnostics are? > > > `-checks=-*,cert-exp36-c,modernize-unary-static-assert` > > the result: > > real 52m6.886s > user 298m8.824s > sys 7m29.292s > > `-checks=-*,modernize-unary-static-assert` > > the result: > > real 52m5.305s > user 302m38.508s > sys 8m53.008s What was meant is, run the check over some large codebase (e.g. all of the LLVM itself), and upload the results somewhere. Then analyze the results. Are there any obvious false-positives? If yes, then minimize the testcase, add it into `test/clang-tidy/cert-avoid-pointer-cast-to-more-strict-alignment.cpp` and fix it's handling. Are there clear bugs in the analyzed code? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D33826 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
