aengelke wrote:

> hopefully avoiding the addition of additional global state sneaking into 
> existing global state.

This is generally very agreeable. Nonetheless it'd be more beneficial to not 
just mark such variables as const but to change the code in a way that it also 
needs neither global constructors (i.e., non-constexpr constructors) nor 
dynamic relocations.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184352
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to