arphaman added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574#858763, @klimek wrote:

> One of my main concerns is still that I don't see the need for all the 
> template magic yet :) Why doesn't everybody use the RefactoringResult we 
> define here?


@klimek, are you talking about the template usage in this patch or the whole 
approach in general? I can probably think of some way to reduce the template 
boilerplate if you are talking about the general approach.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to