ilya-biryukov marked 3 inline comments as done.
ilya-biryukov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdServer.h:113
+ /// queue. The request will be run on a separate thread.
+ template <class Func, class... Args> void addToFront(Func &&F, Args &&...
As);
+ /// Add a new request to run function \p F with args \p As to the end of the
----------------
bkramer wrote:
> Why the template? This is awkward now because it can only be called from
> ClangdServer.cpp
Storing `std::future`s with `std::async(std::launch::deferred, ...` makes
things easier than storing `std::function`, as that allows to move into the
caller(`std::function` must be copyable).
But we want to store only properly created `std::future`s, so we create them on
our own, hence the signature similar to `std::async`.
I actually think that the signature itself is not that bad, but the fact that
definition is only available in `.cpp` file is wrong. I've moved definintions
to header.
================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdUnitStore.cpp:22
return;
OpenedFiles.erase(It);
}
----------------
bkramer wrote:
> Not introduced in this commit, but this is equivalent to
> OpenedFiles.erase(File) without the find and check.
The code has changed a bit after initial submission. It returns removed element
now and there seems to be no equivalent in `StringMap` for that.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36133
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
