trcrsired wrote: > Ok - I still think that's not a particularly compelling argument. It's much > easier for users to add something to the link line than to remove something > from it and adding something that the user didn't asker for seems > undesirable, even if it doesn't actually change the set of loaded libraries > in practice. At the very least it forces the linker to do extra work. So > continued NAK from me.
it is not that easy to add -lntdll to the link line from my experience. Just like adding -lpthread was a huge headache https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162997 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
