trcrsired wrote: > What is the motivation for this change? I understand that gcc links it with > mcf threads, but AFAICT the corresponding patch on the gcc side > (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655464.html) to do this > by default was not merged in the end, so this would diverge our behavior. In > general I'm not a huge fan of adding additional thinks to the link line > unless required by the implicitly linked runtime libraries, so I'm a mild NAK > unless there's another compelling reason to do this, but all cc @mstorsjo for > an opinion.
asking user to link -lntdll is annoying since it is always dynamically linked by the OS. This just allows users to use ntdll more easily. That GCC patch was submitted by me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162997 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
