ojhunt wrote:

> @ojhunt Can we consider this PR obsolete and close it since we no longer use 
> this union approach and things are already (almost) fixed in the main 
> unwinding PR #143230?

They're macros that are used, and are useful on their own so upstreaming still 
seems sensible? they were just for the unwind work I had just genuinely assumed 
they were already upstreamed :D

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161027
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to