efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/CodeGenCXX/msabi-blocks.cpp:90
+}
+
----------------
compnerd wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > The Itanium ABI document lists five cases where the mangling is externally
> > visible. I think this is missing a testcase for the "initializers of
> > nonspecialized static members of template classes" case. (Something like
> > "template<typename T> class X { static T foo; }; template<typename T> T
> > X<T>::foo = ^{static int i = e(); return ++i;}();".)
> This is currently broken even under the itanium scheme. I think that doing
> that in a follow up is reasonable.
>
> ```
> template <typename T>
> struct s {
> static T i;
> };
>
> template <typename T>
> T s<T>::i = ^{ static T i = T(); return i; }();
>
> template class s<int>;
> template class s<short>;
> ```
Fine; please file a bug.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34523
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
