erichkeane wrote: > > Sensible? Or presumably we can have an always-inline function wrapper for > > that, and the inliner will just take care of it. > > Yeah, I think the inline helper is cleaner, we can just discard ID before > calling anything not inline.
Sounds good to me, an `always_inline` tagged one (there is a LLVM flag for it?!) would probably have no overhead as a result. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157692 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
