On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > Do you want the same encoding for the bitfield “int : 1” you saw before > r297792, which is just “i"? > > The encoding for bitfield is normally bN where N is the number of bits, > but the comment in function EncodeBitField says GNU runtime encodes it > differently.
Sorry, can't answer that. I primarily care about a new clang crash that didn't exist before, cut I can't answer what the correct behavior should be. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
