Do you want the same encoding for the bitfield “int : 1” you saw before
r297792, which is just “i"?
The encoding for bitfield is normally bN where N is the number of bits, but the
comment in function EncodeBitField says GNU runtime encodes it differently.
> On Jun 22, 2017, at 8:30 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 05:58:41PM -0700, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
>>> It crashes when there is an anonymous ivar of a bitfield type.
>>>
>>> @interface FormatScanner {
>>> int : 1;
>>> }
>>> @end
>>>
>>> @implementation FormatScanner
>>> @end
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if the code above is valid or not, but out of curiosity,
>>> why would you want an anonymous bitfield variable?
>>
>> It's a reduced test case. The original test case has a variable name in
>> it.
>
> Ping?
>
> Joerg
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
