================
@@ -141,3 +141,9 @@ TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest,
Test_OP_nop_OP_reg) {
TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest, Test_OP_LLVM_nop_OP_reg) {
TestExprPrinter({DW_OP_LLVM_user, DW_OP_LLVM_nop, DW_OP_reg0}, "R0");
}
+
+TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest, Test_OP_LLVM_user_unknown_subop) {
+ TestExprPrinter({DW_OP_LLVM_user, DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address},
+ "<unknown op DW_OP_LLVM_user (233) subop "
+ "DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address (2)>");
----------------
OCHyams wrote:
I'm sure this has been discussed elsewhere, but out of curiosity why is
`DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address` not a `DW_OP_LLVM_user` subop? In the test
above it looks like it is, some I'm a bit confused
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153883
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
