================
@@ -141,3 +141,9 @@ TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest,
Test_OP_nop_OP_reg) {
TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest, Test_OP_LLVM_nop_OP_reg) {
TestExprPrinter({DW_OP_LLVM_user, DW_OP_LLVM_nop, DW_OP_reg0}, "R0");
}
+
+TEST_F(DWARFExpressionCompactPrinterTest, Test_OP_LLVM_user_unknown_subop) {
+ TestExprPrinter({DW_OP_LLVM_user, DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address},
+ "<unknown op DW_OP_LLVM_user (233) subop "
+ "DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address (2)>");
----------------
slinder1 wrote:
It is a subop, the message is trying to say "unknown op+subop
(DW_OP_LLVM_user+DW_OP_LLVM_form_aspace_address)"
It is only "unknown" to the DWARFExpressionCompactPrinter, not to the codebase
in general (we have a name for it at least, so it can't be that unknown)
I just extended the existing diagnostic message here, but maybe it could be
improved?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153883
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
