llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy Author: Nicolas van Kempen (nicovank) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> Fix #<!-- -->157343. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157384.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst (+1-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst index 05f1d85f1af5a..eb605c5b0a53b 100644 --- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst +++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ marked with ``noexcept`` or marked with ``noexcept(expr)`` where ``expr`` evaluates to ``false`` (but is not a ``false`` literal itself). Move constructors of all the types used with STL containers, for example, -need to be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL will choose copy constructors +should be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL may choose copy constructors instead. The same is valid for move assignment operations. `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157384 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
