https://github.com/nicovank created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157384
Fix #157343. >From 9d425a009d17385cc9bf1b9649084e68fde65c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas van Kempen <nvank...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 00:44:15 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Minor documentation wording for performance-noexcept-move-constructor Fix #157343. --- .../clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst index 05f1d85f1af5a..eb605c5b0a53b 100644 --- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst +++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor.rst @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ marked with ``noexcept`` or marked with ``noexcept(expr)`` where ``expr`` evaluates to ``false`` (but is not a ``false`` literal itself). Move constructors of all the types used with STL containers, for example, -need to be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL will choose copy constructors +should be declared ``noexcept``. Otherwise STL may choose copy constructors instead. The same is valid for move assignment operations. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
