baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33537#770264, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I think we should try to get as much of this functionality in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333 as possible; there is a considerable amount > of overlap between that functionality and this functionality. This check can > then cover only the parts that are not reasonably handled by the frontend > check instead of duplicating diagnostics the user already receives. I suppose that the frontend check will not travarse the call-graph just check direct throws. Should we only check indirect throws then? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33537 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
