aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33537#771159, @baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33537#770264, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > I think we should try to get as much of this functionality in > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333 as possible; there is a considerable amount > > of overlap between that functionality and this functionality. This check > > can then cover only the parts that are not reasonably handled by the > > frontend check instead of duplicating diagnostics the user already receives. > > > I suppose that the frontend check will not travarse the call-graph just check > direct throws. Should we only check indirect throws then? The check in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333 is using a CFG, not just checking direct throws. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33537 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
